← All features
Org Transformation

Does your org chart match
your architecture?

The Team Architecture view maps your codebase to your team topology — revealing ownership clarity, contested modules, and coordination overhead that your Git history has already recorded. Conway's Law made measurable, not theoretical.

Explore in live demo →
Live Demo
Team Architecture
Team Health Table · Module Ownership Heatmap · Team Coordination Matrix · Ownership Drift Timeline · Reorg Validator. Contested modules, ownership shifts over time, and a before/after view of reorganisation impact. Real data from the MongoDB open-source repository.
Open in live demo →
Real data · No login required · Read-only

What it shows

  • Team Health TableEach team's top three modules by commit volume, with an ownership status badge — Clear ownership, Contested, No redundancy, or Unassigned activity. Instantly identifies where clarity is missing.
  • Module Ownership HeatmapModule × team matrix. Green = dominant owner (>50%), yellow = significant contributor (>20%), grey = present (<20%). Contested modules — where multiple teams contribute meaningfully — appear first.
  • Team Coordination MatrixCross-team co-change events per team pair. Every cell is accumulated coordination overhead that shows up in your Git history — not in your retro notes.
  • Ownership Drift TimelineStacked area chart showing each team's share of commits per module across quarterly buckets. Only modules with a meaningful ownership shift (≥10%) appear — the earliest signal that a team is drifting out of its domain.
  • Reorg ValidatorEnter a reorganisation date. Calyntro compares Cross-Team Coupling Pairs, Coordination Events, and Contested Modules before and after — with delta indicators. The quantitative answer to "did the reorg work?"
  • Three KPI cardsCross-Team Coupling Pairs, Coordination Events, and Contested Modules — always visible, independent of the active tab. The three numbers that tell you whether your team topology is aligned with your architecture or fighting it.

When to use it

Org transformation

Moving to stream-aligned or platform teams? The heatmap shows which modules are already cleanly owned and which need ownership negotiation before the restructure.

Team topology design

Design team boundaries from evidence, not intuition. Where coupling is high and ownership is contested, the team topology needs to change — or the architecture does.

Engineering leadership review

Quantify coordination overhead for leadership: not "teams are stepping on each other's toes" but "167 cross-team coupling pairs generating 46,208 coordination events."

Post-reorg validation

After a restructuring, the Reorg Validator gives you the numbers: did cross-team coupling go down? Did contested modules decrease? Evidence-based follow-through, not a gut-feeling retrospective.

Inverse Conway Manoeuvre

If you want a loosely coupled architecture, you need loosely coupled teams.

The Team Architecture view gives transformation coaches and engineering leaders the data to run this in reverse: start with where the code couples today, identify which team boundaries amplify that coupling, and make a structured case for change — backed by commit history, not gut feel.

See it on your codebase

The live demo shows Team Architecture on the MongoDB repository — real ownership patterns, real coordination data. Get in touch to run it on yours.

Explore in live demo → Get in touch